Live now
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Agreed and better articulated than my uncertain reaction to the video.I was just going to 'no comment' this review. BUT I don't want to be a complete sour puss lol and there were a few positives, although in hindight im struggling to recall them. It hasn't really made me any more excited for the car however (I don't think Henry was genuinely too excited either) if anything I'm just apprehensive about the whole purchase.
Watching that video I didn't feel any of the 'New Lotus' vibes they are keen to portray. Wrongly or rightly it felt like reskinned Evora with a more comfortable new interior that should all be sorted by time customers take delivery (I'm sure it will). It doesn't help harking back to the Lotus Esprit at this point either, as it is looking backwards again and not forwards. So not cool in my opinion.
I can understand your concerns......it come across as a revised, new body and re fettled Evora, wider track plus more engine and box options etc. But both the 911 and Caymen/Boxster iterations are just that....OK, the 911 now has Turbos and the engine is 32mm further forward and the interior build integrity has improved, but it's not really changed......sounds similar?I was just going to 'no comment' this review. BUT I don't want to be a complete sour puss lol and there were a few positives, although in hindight im struggling to recall them. It hasn't really made me any more excited for the car however (I don't think Henry was genuinely too excited either) if anything I'm just apprehensive about the whole purchase.
Watching that video I didn't feel any of the 'New Lotus' vibes they are keen to portray. Wrongly or rightly it felt like reskinned Evora with a more comfortable new interior that should all be sorted by time customers take delivery (I'm sure it will). It doesn't help harking back to the Lotus Esprit at this point either, as it is looking backwards again and not forwards. So not cool in my opinion.
Very good point-Porsche are still an evolution and origins of a VW BeetleI can understand your concerns......it come across as a revised, new body and re fettled Evora, wider track plus more engine and box options etc. But both the 911 and Caymen/Boxster iterations are just that....OK, the 911 now has Turbos and the engine is 32mm further forward and the interior build integrity has improved, but it's not really changed......sounds similar?
Guess that's automotive development for you, minimise capital and development costs but re-create demand.
Yep , kind of get what you are saying.... I enjoyed the video, but was left feeling we need more. TG said it is dfferent in every diemenion.... Hennry ..... reskinned Evora.... not helpful ..... I undertstand why they wanted to get reiws out.... but am looking forward to part 2I was just going to 'no comment' this review. BUT I don't want to be a complete sour puss lol and there were a few positives, although in hindight im struggling to recall them. It hasn't really made me any more excited for the car however (I don't think Henry was genuinely too excited either) if anything I'm just apprehensive about the whole purchase.
Watching that video I didn't feel any of the 'New Lotus' vibes they are keen to portray. Wrongly or rightly it felt like reskinned Evora with a more comfortable new interior that should all be sorted by time customers take delivery (I'm sure it will). It doesn't help harking back to the Lotus Esprit at this point either, as it is looking backwards again and not forwards. So not cool in my opinion.
Look at how far the Porsche has come though in the last 14 years, be it in 987 or 997 form.I can understand your concerns......it come across as a revised, new body and re fettled Evora, wider track plus more engine and box options etc. But both the 911 and Caymen/Boxster iterations are just that....OK, the 911 now has Turbos and the engine is 32mm further forward and the interior build integrity has improved, but it's not really changed......sounds similar?
Guess that's automotive development for you, minimise capital and development costs but re-create demand.
I'm sure if it was rubbish they'd have called out more areas where improvements were needed. Pistonheads said the car was superb - they also said the new GT3 was superb.Look at how far the Porsche has come though in the last 14 years, be it in 987 or 997 form.
Basically as a new Lotus customer I don't want to be constantly reminded of Lotus's previous shortcomings and putting this development car out for general review 3 months away from delivering customer ready cars really hasn't helped.
I haven't read Pistonheads yet. Obviously need to get my critical ass over there and get my mojo backI'm sure if it was rubbish they'd have called out more areas where improvements were needed. Pistonheads said the car was superb - they also said the new GT3 was superb.
Lets not forget that the Emira looks gorgeous, a Cayman does not. There's going to be areas where the Cayman excels and the Lotus doesn't.
Be interesting to find out how many new orders Lotus are now adding due to the early reviews.
Good to see the touring chassis used and reviewers saying its good - rather than the sports.
Thats why I’m more eager to wait for the review of AMG version, a much different car to the V6 Manual by the looks of things. Not an “Old-friend” in the engine bay and none of the carried over quirks of the V6 drivetrain. The V6 manual has always been a limited run to satisfy the purists and nostalgic journos. I think the EMIRA had the AMG as primary design brief, especially the Asian/Chinese Market don’t even get the V6…..I can understand your concerns......it come across as a revised, new body and re fettled Evora, wider track plus more engine and box options etc. But both the 911 and Caymen/Boxster iterations are just that....OK, the 911 now has Turbos and the engine is 32mm further forward and the interior build integrity has improved, but it's not really changed......sounds similar?
Guess that's automotive development for you, minimise capital and development costs but re-create demand.
Well, lots of positives in this review - the car is clearly going to be great to drive - but like others I am deeply, deeply unimpressed that Lotus didn't have a production spec car ready at this very late stage. This tells me that Lotus have been very pushed for time in finishing development in order to hit the production schedule, and raises big concerns in my mind about whether those of us in the June batch will end up with a car which is still a work in progress and beset with quality niggles. What do others with an early production slot think about this?
I am now going to give serious consideration to seeing if I can slip down the queue by two or three months. I don't even know if that is possible without losing your place altogether?
These reviews have made my decision to buy this car exponentially more exciting! I am thrilled beyond belief and totally unable to contain my enthusiasm. Literally wish I bought two of them.I can't put my finger on it as to why ,but I'm not fulfilled after watching that,and starting to think for 80k I might enjoy something else more...
Is it just me?
I agree they are confident that their validation model will impress and it has done - still taking feedback and improvements is a step change from what i hear of lotus of old.These reviews have made my decision to buy this car exponentially more exciting! I am thrilled beyond belief and totally unable to contain my enthusiasm. Literally wish I bought two of them.
For Lotus to open up and have reviews of prototypes, pre-production cars, new manufacturing facilities, and do roadshows touring the car across the world so customers could see the car in person is unprecedented for a new model car. I feel like I'm part of the development process and they're taking feedback and making whatever adjustments they can real time. What automaker does that? Think about it...
Lotus is doing an amazing job when you step back and look at everything. I've been all in on the Emira since day one and today after these reviews I'm doubling down. This car is seriously like that.
These reviews have made my decision to buy this car exponentially more exciting! I am thrilled beyond belief and totally unable to contain my enthusiasm. Literally wish I bought two of them.
i think the majority of this forum would disagree that they are taking feedback - they do not communicate well enough to receive it.These reviews have made my decision to buy this car exponentially more exciting! I am thrilled beyond belief and totally unable to contain my enthusiasm. Literally wish I bought two of them.
For Lotus to open up and have reviews of prototypes, pre-production cars, new manufacturing facilities, and do roadshows touring the car across the world so customers could see the car in person is unprecedented for a new model car. I feel like I'm part of the development process and they're taking feedback and making whatever adjustments they can real time. What automaker does that? Think about it...
Lotus is doing an amazing job when you step back and look at everything. I've been all in on the Emira since day one and today after these reviews I'm doubling down. This car is seriously like that.
I was just going to 'no comment' this review. BUT I don't want to be a complete sour puss lol and there were a few positives, although in hindight im struggling to recall them. It hasn't really made me any more excited for the car however (I don't think Henry was genuinely too excited either) if anything I'm just apprehensive about the whole purchase.
Watching that video I didn't feel any of the 'New Lotus' vibes they are keen to portray. Wrongly or rightly it felt like reskinned Evora with a more comfortable new interior that should all be sorted by time customers take delivery (I'm sure it will). It doesn't help harking back to the Lotus Esprit at this point either, as it is looking backwards again and not forwards. So not cool in my opinion.
I agree. I detected zero excitement. What was attempted, wasn't believable.Well, the most used word was prototype. Felt mostly like someone that thinks the car is ok but not something that has me now calling every hour to the dealership trying to know how soon mine will (or will not) arrive.
Its not just you.I can't put my finger on it as to why ,but I'm not fulfilled after watching that,and starting to think for 80k I might enjoy something else more...
Is it just me?
Maybe you haven't spent enough time around Brits. That was literally him being positive.I agree. I detected zero excitement. What was attempted, wasn't believable.
Analogy: Sport versus Touring setup.Maybe you haven't spent enough time around Brits. That was literally him being positive.
The emotional range that's considered "polite" among the English is about 1/10th of what we use in normal daily interactions in the US. They generally find us alarming.
i think the majority of this forum would disagree that they are taking feedback - they do not communicate well enough to receive it.
I have also watched the Top Gear video now which reinstated my enthusiasm, maybe i wasnt getting what i hoped from the Carfection review
Ahh, expectations , it is our expectations that make these reviews less than desired by each of us. If we started with a beginners mind then the value of these videos would be appreciated. The journos can only say looking good with caveats for the car being a prototype. They can only give a real review when the final car comes out.Analogy: Sport versus Touring setup.