Leonard
Emira Aficionado
Seats, more complex suspension, supercharger, wider chassis?Indeed, why isn't it lighter than the GTS?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Seats, more complex suspension, supercharger, wider chassis?Indeed, why isn't it lighter than the GTS?
But there is...There's simply nothing like it at its price point, and that's why it's getting so much attention, not because its performance blows everything else off the road. It's a good, solid performer with great looks at a very attractive price.
The GTS has most of these.Seats, more complex suspension, supercharger, wider chassis?
The point was needing to pay 50 / 70K extra for a carbon monocoque, changing the frame of the conversation because that wasn’t true is sly but doesn’t change that you don’t.Yeah, with Alfa you got the monocoque and nothing more. Not even an engine. Great package as well
the cayman gts has many aluminium panels, boot, bonnet and doors if I recall from trying to attach the door protectors via magnets to them haha.The GTS has most of these.
It’s got adaptive suspension (more complex than the passive lotus).
It’s also made of steel which the lotus fans will conveniently forget to mention….
Exactly.the cayman gts has many aluminium panels, boot, bonnet and doors if I recall from trying to attach the door protectors via magnets to them haha.
It would seem to me that the 911 or 718 packaging is just much better than most cars, it gives them 2 luggage spaces which are amazing.....
If lotus could start from scratch they would probably change their fundamental design, but this car was never going to do that for the 5-6 odd years it lasts. However, if they knew the sales numbers would be so high, they may have done just that...
Too late now, it is what it is
Hmmm,I know everyone is worried about supply chain issues, so perhaps they need to spell out everything that is included.
What next? "Comes with four wheels and tyres"? (everyone knows there isn't a spare wheel right?)
Isn't the Artura hybrid? Aka heavier?
No it shouldn't. Steel is heavier than aluminum, you are right with that, but some people tend to forget that steel is also stronger and therefore you need less. That's why all really big manufacturers stopped using aluminium and switched to high strength steel. Lotus is sticking to bonded aluminum, because it's proven, gluing is the lightest way to build an aluminium car, because they have the knowledge, and the tech. It's the only way to make an aluminium car as light and yet as strong as a steel car, but nobody said that you will eventually be much lighter. If you use this tech to build a tiny, stripped Elise, then of course you are lighter than everybody else (except Mazda who are building an equally small, less stripped car with more tech that has the same weight as an Elise, but is made out of steel).Exactly.
The Emira chassis is bonded / extruded aluminium with composite panels (though I’ve read the rear subframe is steel on the V6)…so should still in theory be lighter.
That wouldn't make sense because its composite panels are lighter than steel could ever be. We were talking about the chassis itself. A construction like the Caymans chassis eats up way more money for development, because it's more complex. They are using many different types of steel and many different material strengths. They can do that because economies of scale look better with the Cayman than with the Emira. They are selling tens of thousands every year and charging a similar price than Lotus. Of course they could then put more money in the car in the first place.Can you craft the Emiras exotic body panels in steel at this price point?
All true I am sure, but the sales figures I think are over estimated when you say tens of thousands. The US is the biggest market for porshe and they hardly even sell 5000 units a year there on average and thats cayman AND boxster, 718s total sales. Their yearly production is no more than 20,000 718s total again, and the car is and has not been a "big" seller for them for many years now, although I am sure Lotus would love those sales figures, but Lotus are not porsche of course. These sales are not a shock given its a sports car I guess, but also as they have not invested in the 718 for the last 8 years, apart from GT versions. Which shows how good it was in the first place, especially with the V6 engine, although to be fair the 4 cly was in its top model the S, and it pains me to say it, probably quicker than the Emira V6 anyway, but sounded not so good.That wouldn't make sense because its composite panels are lighter than steel could ever be. We were talking about the chassis itself. A construction like the Caymans chassis eats up way more money for development, because it's more complex. They are using many different types of steel and many different material strengths. They can do that because economies of scale look better with the Cayman than with the Emira. They are selling tens of thousands every year and charging a similar price than Lotus. Of course they could then put more money in the car in the first place.
That's also something to consider in general. If Porsche is selling way more cars, but charging the same money Lotus does, they could spend more for the development and still make a bigger margin.