Lotustoronto
Emira Addict
You need to take price into consideration. Otherwise it's just another ranking like this vid:For me, without an ever-ending list and without going into suspension settings and the flakes in the metallic paint.. here is how I would base my opinion. Not saying everyone else should use the same factors, but I do think people should think what their 10 is, irrelevant of price, and go down from there.
This for me would be my ten
1. A car with go kart like feel and steering, pure return on input, so exciting that you dont want to stop driving it, not even to let your partner pee...or not even to let your partner go with you - think caterham / atom / BAC mono
This needs to balance with ride quality, absorbing bumps, not like a rolls royce or an S class, but a solid 5 series for example.
= hence for me an 8 here... it rides well and comfy, decent combination.
2. Interior quality - come on, a 9 here is your lambo if you like that kind of thing, or your latest porsche 911 if you want a bit more down to earth, but it has to be high quality and a design thats not just thrown together with the centre screen stuck on the dash as an after thought. *remember, we are going for 10's not whats expected in this price bracket.
= maximum a 6... its way off a 911, its a sporty volvo from 3 4 years ago
3. Design - for me a ferrari roma is a 9 (and yes I detest...strong word, ferraris, but I appreciate the design, or the Aston Martin DB10 (the car the vantage should always have been!).
= 8... again, its NOT the best looking car out there, I would take a DB10, if it existed, in a heart beat, the roma makes it look like a toy car, BUT the Emira makes the Alpine look like a contorted roller coaster of a design, and makes the 718 look 8 years old... irony.
4. Sound - has to be a GT3 / Ferrari V12 / Audi V10 / Aston V12 ... there are many approximating 10 that mean the V6 has an impossible job to get there.
= 7...a V6 cant compare, but again, thats the point... 10 would be if it did.
5. Power - Yes you can have too much of a good thing, but I think many of us feel todays sport cars weighing 1500 kilos should have around 450 - 500. More is a waste on roads, but its like a gym at a hotel, you wont use it, but its nice to know its there. I could have used a cruder example.....
= 6.5 ... its not powerful enough for me to think, ohhh best take it easy...or oh, I can catch that car in front easy.. again, its not comparing to a GTS, its comparing to a gt3, whatever your 10 would be.
6. Gear change - for me, a shortened through MX5 box, for many of the hand made cars, westfield / caterham is a 9 and no porsche gets close in my mind, not even the gt3.
= 6 ... no where near porsche's and way off MX5s modified for sportier cars... remains to be seen if final cars improved over regular evora / exige. but its never going to be a 10/9/8
Hence, this is why I make it a 7.5 at best and I dont feel stingy at all.
If we start making excuses for our ratings, thinking, "but it only costs xxxx$, its a lotus not a ferrari, its only had 2 years development, its british, resources" and all the other excuses, then it's impossible, we can all just say 10 and be done with it.
A car reviewer doesnt rate a Daewoo (never spelt that before) with all these considerations.... they give it a 5/10 as its not got merc interiors, or ferrari power, or italian design.... Again, this is the Doug way and we should be consistent...or not.... just an idea
Thats my sunday morning logic..take it or.....have a coffee and bagel..