On the topic of Sport vs Touring is there any consideration to resale value?
Could there be a cost to one or the other in post FE releases?
Is one or the other even going to be a consideration to an FE buyer down the road considering how limited they’ll be?
Unlike Manual vs Automatic where some folks can’t even drive a stick…
I live in Chesterfield so the peaks are on my doorstep and there are some bad roads granted, but then there are some good roads. You will always doubt your decision no matter what suspension you get - wish i could have gone sports , or would touring have been more comfier on this road. I'm of the opinion that if people aspire to the sportiest Porsches with sports suspension then surely the same is true for Lotus. And lets be honest unless you have a really soft sprung car you are going to feel the bumps. How gutted would you feel if you found out sports suspension was a £1000 option on a base car but touring was free
I’d caution you not to try and read across from another manufacturer’s strategy, such as Porsche. Lotus really want people to spec the suspension that suits their usage and that’s why both are the same cost on the V6 First Edition. The component counts and costs are the same, so the only reason to price it differently on Base Edition will be perception not cost or drivability. About 60% of Emiras so far have been specified with Touring, so there will be similar numbers of both setups second hand and clearly demand for both.
The roll you see in the video is designed in and, as Dan says, is to give the driver another cue about speed and corner force. Lotus will have designed it (like the Evora) to roll a certain amount and then stiffen up. So you get the physical indication of cornering but then it doesn’t wallow. This is actually a much better experience for a regular driver, as it helps you understand the physics of the car. They do describe how amazing the front end grip and handling appears to be.
When Jean Marc Gales became CEO of Lotus he insisted the Elise couldn’t be sold with a Touring suspension and had to be Sport only, because it was a sports car. They gave him an unlabelled car to use for a few weeks. After he’d raved about the handling they pointed out it was “only Touring” and both options stayed on sale, with Touring selling more than Sports.
On Monday I borrowed an Evora GT410 Sport (equivalent to Emira Sport suspension) to run for a couple of hours back to back with my Evora S (same as Touring). I remain convinced that Touring is the better setup for fast driving on UK mixed surface roads and long distance road trips plus the occasional track day.
Sport is OK on the road but even on a well-surfaced but undulating road the extra stiffness is apparent. It’s a level of extra jigging that I’d find annoying on a long trip on highways or single carriageways. And my passenger didn’t like it. Cross-country and pressing on, the Sport sometimes broke traction on rough, off-camber or pot holed roads, so although the driving feel is slightly more direct it’s actually a bit more frustrating. On public roads where you can’t drive 10/10ths (or even 8/10ths) I don’t think you’re getting much advantage with Sports and quite a few compromises.
But to some extent we’re splitting hairs. If you only drove Sport you’d be happy with it. And if you had Touring and never knew about Sport you’d be very happy too. Owners of Evora S generally don’t say “I wish it had stiffer suspension” and Evora 410 owners don’t complain about crashiness and their fillings falling out.