Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Maybe the dynamic attributes team need to be re-educated on what good looks like. The mantra 'for the drivers" seems to be sadly misaligned.Oh dear just reading that review does not fill me with confidence that this is a drivers car so has Jenson Button been spouting a load of tosh
From reading that review it doesn’t even come across as exciting to drive. Getting the feeling we’re paying £80k for just something that looks good but is a step back where they have been & from being a drivers car. Quotes:
” you could argue this is a lot of money for a car with a Toyota V6 “and yet again gearbox is called out
” fails to deliver thrills like a Cayman does “
“ we wish it luck “ oh dear
when I read this it gives me the impression when I drive it I’ll just think I’m driving bog standard car not a sports car. Sounds like they have dialled it back to be too civilised - thats not what I thought I was getting …..
I’m sorry but these reviews are not great at all
It feels that way. I have no doubt that it can be 'fixed' aftermarket. But I'm past tweaking my cars now, I just want it to work out of the box (despite already accepting I need a cat bypass on this car...)One thing I find curious about the reviews this week is that on aggregate they seem to be less positive about the car's dynamics than they were about the white VP car that the press had access to back in March. Maybe that reflects the weight of expectation on a car which should be finished , maybe it is because more miles have been driven on the road, but I do wonder if in the final finessing of the car's suspension over the last few months Gav & co have taken the car a little too far in the direction of comfort and usability for Lotus newcomers rather than the pin sharp responses which us enthusiasts want. I am sure there is a major post-mortem going on at Hethel of all the reviews but I would guess it is way too late now for further dynamic tweaks before production of customer cars starts.
It feels that way. I have no doubt that it can be 'fixed' aftermarket. But I'm past tweaking my cars now, I just want it to work out of the box (despite already accepting I need a cat bypass on this car.
There are a few custom exhaust places, but I think I'd probably wait until someone brings one out aftermarket and then fit myselfdo you know anyone in Derby who could cat bypass?
A 430 HP seems to be confirmed by Evo in its final final edition, probably in a year or two.....What's the likelihood of a V6 more hard core version?
I agree with that. The car looks incredible and will feel incredible to us all. Not eve 1% of me considered 'oh, it must be a bad car'.I'm honestly kind of shocked by how many people are so turned off by these journalists' reviews.
It feels that way. I have no doubt that it can be 'fixed' aftermarket. But I'm past tweaking my cars now, I just want it to work out of the box (despite already accepting I need a cat bypass on this car...)
Absolutely a fair comment and many others will be the same.For me it is such a big investment moneywise that I really have to justify it for myself spending so much money on a car. And in that regard it just has to blow me away.
Id 'argue' that they probably did know and that there was probably a case within Lotus to give it more power initially. Hence Matt and a few others quoting 416bhp.Here's the problem as I see it. The car looks like it should be the fastest thing on the road, and it isn't. That's the letdown. This is why we saw people so upset that it didn't/doesn't have more power. They want the performance to match the looks. I think had Lotus known how it would be received, they probably would have in fact put more into the power, but they didn't know, and took what seemed the most reasonable and realistic path at the time. However if it had the performance to match the looks, it wouldn't be under $100k, then it wouldn't have the huge demand it has now. Somewhat of a Catch 22.
I think they made the right choice business-wise, which was a choice they had to make. As Matt said, "If you want sports cars, we have to make money". It may not be the perfect car in all ways that some were hoping it would be, but then that's a Lotus, isn't it. And in that regard, it really is a Lotus. I think as people live with it, they're going to find out why Lotus people love their cars.
Another 16 hp isn't enough to match the looks of the car. Although I personally don't need more, the looks give the impression it has 450-500 which some forum members have said they wished it had. If it had that much power, it would be the performer it looks like it should be. If it had the Alfa Romeo QV's twin turbo 6 with 505 hp in it, it would be killer. In that regard, those people are/were right.Id 'argue' that they probably did know and that there was probably a case within Lotus to give it more power initially. Hence Matt and a few others quoting 416bhp.
Only Lotus knows why this has changed, it cant be money as it's all purely software as far as I'm aware. But they must know that it's a disappointment to prespective buyers, especially as it now appears that we have lost another 6 horses and 200 rpm... that's the real rub at this stage!
20 bhp moreAnother 16 hp isn't enough to match the looks of the car.
I'm honestly kind of shocked by how many people are so turned off by these journalists' reviews. None of us have driven the car. I'd prefer to make my own judgement after driving the car as opposed to relying on something said by some person I don't know.
Correct me if I'm wrong here, but none of these reviews thus far have been given by professional racing drivers - - just guys who know how to speak / write eloquently and who happen to have the opportunity to do that about cars for a living.
Until I hear a professional driver pick the vehicle apart, I'm content to withhold jumping to conclusions.
Will this be the best sports car ever/for the money/Lotus has ever made? Perhaps not - - but it's not going to be a dud, either. If you want a pure driver's car that makes no exceptions, go buy a Caterham 7 and a bottle of Tylenol. If you want the refined-to-sterility "king", get your dental license and buy the elongated-Beetle, err, Porsche Caymen/911/I can't tell them apart.
Everyone take your fingers off the trigger and just breathe. It will be alright and this will be a great driver's car.
Youi might be right... Umm.The combination of those might get US models back up to the expected 416hp