This thread has gotten weird. I get sad when I see terms "fan boy" and "kool aid" getting thrown around, regardless of the topic. Seeing as I'm avoiding doing some real work for a few minutes, I'll see if I can further stir people up with a lengthy waffle about how things sit in my head
I think there are a confluence of factors that have resulted in what I'm going to call a slightly disappointing (but clearly not deal-breaking) performance rating for the First Edition of the Emira.
- the V6 is a known quantity to Lotus, and lets them get to market quicker
- the V6 is a giant pain in their ass with regard to current and upcoming emissions targets being difficult to meet if it is tuned hard, and also with regard to what can be coaxed out of the engine and gearbox
while still keeping pricing within the market bracket they are trying to hit
- the i4 is known to be a performance hero, and also meets emissions targets nicely
- however, Lotus are reluctant to let the i4 outshine the V6 (at least initially) because it would be confusing from a marketing perspective, so the i4 is (disappointingly IMO) hobbled.
- Lotus are also presumably still "getting to know" the i4 engine, so may have been fairly conservative with the tune so they do not run face first into a global reliability / overheating / fuel compatibility / whatever fiasco straight out of the gate.
I think the comparison to the trajectory from Evora "First Edition" to GT / Final Edition are somewhat apt, but needs to consider
both drivetrains for the Emira. What is muddying the water here is that, yes, they are shipping ye olde V6 as that gets the car out the door sooner (and as a bit of fan service), but the real development and performance improvement is ironically going to be carried by the AMG drivetrain.
So, to recap: the Emira
should probably have more power, especially from the i4, but Lotus have chosen to a) hit a price point, b) make sure they don't immediately get a bad reputation for reliability, c) let the V6 fans feel more smug than they deserve to be
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e8e8f/e8e8f10ee7969490cfdc1dc1612ff37bbd0ae6f5" alt="Stick out tongue :p :p"
, and d) leave a significant amount of headroom for i4 power bumps over coming years (whether they just expect to get to know the i4 better, or whether they just cynically get to release new editions with a simple remap).
Does it suck? A bit. Are we all kinda stoked anyway? Yes. Am I inevitably going to want to tune the bollocks off my i4 at some point? Probably, once the aftermarket has matured for this model.
I'm not presuming to speak for anyone, but I don't think is too far from where xen / PaulP / 4GIV8M3 stand... we could probably do with skipping the polarising rhetoric though (in either direction).