andrew6382
Emira Fiend
Tom you have it all wrong, I was trying just highlight that some had still had not had the call for the second deposit, example "teamvxracing".... twice i tried to explain to you, and twice you basicly said i was wrong..... but still I was not trying to do this to prove any thing to any one, but infact highlight some had not been contacted, and if you check back you will see others have expressed the same about being contacted. I am not trying to compete with you, but i did have to prove my point to get you to notice what i was saying was true. I do respect you and the help you give others. but I saw somthing was wrong and tried to bring it to you. Thank any way@andrew6382 I'm not offended. Your posts have come across to me as trying to prove that I'm wrong. You've said as much in your last post.
I'm trying to help. I have a (probably unhealthy) understanding of what's going on, some of which we all know is very sub-optimal from a customer standpoint, but is what it is. I've given my Lotus contacts (4 pages worth of) feedback and it is being reviewed. It might make a difference.
I know how the deposit/call/config process should be working in the UK. I don't have any individual data. Trying to tease out who has been contacted and where they are in the process relies on what I read on here. Sometimes that needs clarifying. Sometimes the process hasn't worked as expected. Sometimes (hopefully not too often) my understanding and communication of the process may be wrong or incomplete - happy to be corrected so everyone gets clarity.
My sole purpose in spending several hours on this every day is to help people understand what the process is supposed to be, and provide as accurate information as we (as a community) can pull together in the absence of direct Lotus input. I particularly don't want people to miss out or make wrong decisions because the process broke or they had the wrong info. "No person left behind" and all that.
The situation with teamvxracing highlights where the process appears not to have worked and someone could miss out. That's what I'm concerned about. Not proving my understanding of the process.
The info that you've had a second call/deposit with an 18 Oct deposit is helpful in showing the process we all thought was being followed was actually followed. It reinforces the key point. Anyone else who hasn't had a second call/email and wants a V6 FE needs to act asap, but if they want an i4 FE or Base they can wait or double check. Then we won't leave anyone behind. The situation on V6 FE third calls is a different issue and it helps if we can be clear which we're talking about.
Today at 9:34 AM
"The people saying they haven't been called yet are in the V6 FE queue and have paid second deposit and generally had 2 calls already, but are waiting for the third call. Originally this would have also been third/final deposit. I had been told these folks (particularly 7/8/9 July deposits) were going to get their third call in January."
Toady at 11:44 AM
"Other people who've said "not had a call yet" are clearly talking about the expected 3rd call in January and we know they've paid first/second deposits."
Last edited: