Komo-Tec power phase released for V6 Emira

[Eagle7]

It got up to 468hp and you didn’t feel it??

Yeah this surprises me as well because that's an increase of 53 ft lbs of torque over stock. With that much of an increase, the car should have launched like a rocket. Is the increase only above a certain rpm?

 

[GlobalPilot777]

It got up to 468hp and you didn’t feel it??

Not after they remote session me to ‘fine’ tune.. after that it was only downhill

 

[Orchardbike]

Some of these tunes limit the torque in the first 2 gears to protect the gearbox. Was this the case? I’ve heard that the Emira gearbox is a little fragile.

 

[kitkat]

View attachment 56116

This were numbers before remote session… after the session everything was shit and my friend with stock emira 1on1 when we did the test

You’re right these are within 20hp of bone stock cars — that’s a lot of money to pay for very little gain.

 

[Speedy Emira]

It has a lot to do with torque, which is what the Emira needs more of. Torque is what gets you off the line and moving. Just out of curiosity, I pulled the stats for the Emira vs the C8, some Porsche's and I threw the Alfa Quadrifoglio in.

As you can see, the cars with the least amount of torque had the slowest 0-60, even though they were also two of the lightest. They were both manuals too, which shows the advantage an automatic can have. You'll also notice the two cars with the most torque had good times, and even though the Alfa was the heaviest, it had the most power and that gave it a decent time.

Gearing has something to do with it too, but the Emira could really benefit from more torque. Once you get above 3k rpms, it pulls quite well so it has power, it just feels soft until you get to 3k, and 0-3k rpm is where your launch is and most of your 0-60 times are.

View attachment 56089

A mate of mine has a 2023 manual Cayman GTS and using a Draggy meter said the average 0-100 kph he gets is 4.4. I checked on the Porsche site and that says 4.5. I have no doubt there are variables like being run in, tyres, whether etc., but he said he has never gone below 4.38.

Porsche 718 Cayman GTS 4.0 - Porsche Great Britain

TBD.

www.porsche.com

I do think its a question of gearing as commented previously but also no point in being a 0-100 warrior with a manual car unless you want a clutch bill in the near future.
I still can't wait to see the first person to get a built JUBU 600+ engine with an Audi DCT. That launch would be insane.

 

[Adam Brouillard]

The Porsche USA website lists the PDK GTS at 0-60 of 3.8 seconds and the manual at 4.3 seconds.

 

[Steve24]

I was going to say there is no way on earth a Cayman is doing 0-60 in 3.3 (would be lucky to do 4.3) but you guys beat me to it!

 

[Eagle7]

I got those figures from Car & Driver, but I'll correct them to the ones Porsche claims.

 

[JUBU Performance]

I did remove it and return it to jubu.. to many unresolved problem. On paper it was pulling 468+hp and 490+nm but in reality i only felt the increase in rpm.. and problems that came along. I did dynod it, i did test it with none jubu emira same mods (decat + air filter) there was absolutely no different from pulls from 0 to pulls from gear. Such a disappointment. Im sure there was power gain maybe available on track use but there was absolutely no significant increase in real power..

Dear GlobalPilot777, please stop making unproven and/or false claims about our products and our company on this forum. We've tested the ECU you sent back and can prove that it works fine. We also did plenty of free support for you (184 emails in total), even for questions/issues that are definitely not related to our product. Despite there is no proven fault from our side, we are happy to fully refund cost of the product (as stated many times before). From our perspective, it feels like you want to fight a personal vendetta against our company - please stop this. To be fully transparent and to provide information to the users of the forum, we've attached your last email as well as the response we've sent to you. Best regards and always stay tuned, Team JUBU Performance.


[attachments removed by moderator]

 

[GlobalPilot777]

Dear GlobalPilot777 please stop making unproven and/or false claims about our products and our company on this forum. We've tested the ECU you sent back and can prove that it works fine. We also did plenty of free support for you (184 emails in total), even for questions/issues that are definitely not related to our product. Despite there is no proven fault from our side, we are happy to fully refund cost of the product (as stated many times before). From our perspective, it feels like you want to fight a personal vendetta against our company - please stop this. To be fully transparent and to provide information to the users of the forum, we've attached your last email as well as the response we've sent to you. Best regards and always stay tuned, Team JUBU Performance.

I have shared here whats my right, to help other forum members. Your product is too expensive for what it does (not).

What you are doing is wrong by disclosing my identity on a public forum. Please delete .

Moderators, please delete this post where my identity is being disclosed!

 

[ToonFan]

Dear GlobalPilot777, please stop making unproven and/or false claims about our products and our company on this forum. We've tested the ECU you sent back and can prove that it works fine. We also did plenty of free support for you (184 emails in total), even for questions/issues that are definitely not related to our product. Despite there is no proven fault from our side, we are happy to fully refund cost of the product (as stated many times before). From our perspective, it feels like you want to fight a personal vendetta against our company - please stop this. To be fully transparent and to provide information to the users of the forum, we've attached your last email as well as the response we've sent to you. Best regards and always stay tuned, Team JUBU Performance.

Whilst I don't think I will be buying this type of upgrade, as a business owner, I commend how Martin at JUBU handled the situation. I read both letters that were attached.

 

[GlobalPilot777]

I have nothing against anybody. I share my personal experience here. I am not bashing anybody nor have a personal vendetta. In fact I have praised the company many times before and have stated positive feedback along the way on this forum.

But I also shared my Personal Experience (frustrations) with the product and the company (and many states the same in private to me, wether theirs are resolved or not, I have never disclosed the group chats here!). All I wanted was a product to work 100% from a renowned company as promised/advertised. It clearly did not. Claiming the power gains and having 10 other problems does not make it a good product. The list is there and its true. The fact that a remote session did not fix issues is also true.. you had to travel all the way to USA to satisfy these folk there.. and with their US rights the deal could have been completely different if you did not take care of them. Because I am alone here the fact is that the priorities are low for you. You could never reply to my emails in a timely manner but all of a sudden now you have time to create an account on a public forum to openly share a privately signed letter. Why?
Where where you in the first place? All vendors where here many years ago.

I am stating only facts her for my personal situation. The 6000+ euros is too much for too little. Period.

From now on for me the case is closed and I will not share anything anymore about this company.

 

[Porter]

I've removed references that could be used to personally identify individuals here.

I understand the concerns on both sides, and will simply warn everyone involved to control their instinct to respond defensively. Please keep interactions on this topic professional and on-topic.

If additional moderation becomes necessary we will be removing posts wholesale, and taking discussions (and possibly user accounts) offline for resolution.

Thank you.