I know Lotus have a comms strategy of not saying anything unless they are confident in it being accurate. Or at least that was the previous strategy in January when Matt told me and Ade that's what it had been. I don't see any evidence of it changing, despite Matt saying they wanted to get better.
It's a high risk strategy, particularly when you cut off all the dealers from your comms and are trying to lure in new buyers from other brands. People who have previously been in a pre-launch process with Lotus or other manufacturers know you don't get test drives, detailed specifications, confirmation of timings until quite close to delivery etc etc. But those exercises have typically been for a few hundred customers - and what they usually do get is some periodic updates with some sort of content.
Lotus launched the Emira globally and on a scale unlike their or many other previous pre-launch exercises. They had to, as they needed to gauge demand so they could build a factory, hire staff and get a supply chain mobilised in the middle of a pandemic. But apart from a few "you're a priority customer" emails, they've not handled it at all like a pre-launch exercise. A large number of customers don't see it as a pre-launch and so have higher expectations on what they will get in terms of info and clarity. That may be unreasonable but Lotus have fallen into the trap of not understanding or managing those people's expectations. They could have told people more about the steps from reveal to launch and some of the uncertainties plus how they were tackling them (as I know they have). They might have lost a few orders, but I think most people would have understood and reset their expectations accordingly.
Instead (for example) they gave hundreds of people specific months when they expected to deliver their cars. They waited to do this until they were close to start of production. There was some small print and cavets, but the key message was "you're in the June/July/etc batch". Two months before the first of those delivery months they then slipped the date. No explanation (in fact some weasely words trying to make it sound like not a delay), followed by confusion on whether the delay affects everyone, some people, people in later months.
Before they communicated the delay, someone must have assessed the underlying causes and how they thought it was going to affect different customers. Why not just tell people that info? It doesn't need a lot of people to communicate it. In fact you could do one email to all customers with the relevant info.
Of course they are focused on quality and getting the cars built. But the people doing that aren't the people who handle the customer comms, so it's not an either/or situation. You can build a quality car AND communicate with customers.
I'll cut Lotus a lot of slack, probably more than most because I know the people, know the car will be brilliant and live near a great dealer for aftersales. For lots of others it's much harder to be patient when the company gives the impression of caring so little about the people buying their cars.