Constructively critical are the key words. That's completely different from mocking and belittling, you know like this:
View attachment 4652
And as you'll note, it's the same few doing this sort of thing, then "liking" each other. It's not hard to figure out who they are.
I'm completely supportive of "constructively critical" as evidenced by going to the trouble (and spending a few dollars), to create better render images when it was immediately obvious their original configurator simply wasn't reliable to make color choices. Do you think my renders (which they acknowledged they had seen) had a possibly positive effect on them getting a much improved configurator in place? Would things have been different if I had simply complained about it over and over, resorting to mocking and belittling them?
I understand frustration and dissatisfaction, but there's a way to put things to try and improve the situation instead of making it worse.
I recently watched a fascinating video of a discussion between Jordan Peterson and Claire Lehmann, the founding editor of Quillette magazine, about the effects of different personality types on groups and meetings. They talked about what happens when aggressive types come in and start trying to dominate the discussion. The moderate types eventually get tired of the aggression, stop talking and start to leave. The passive types never participate because they don't want to be confrontational. They leave too. Eventually whatever discussion and enthusiasm was there originally, is no longer there and it comes to an end, or just becomes a rallying point for those who agree with the aggressors. Both her and Jordan talked about the hostility they receive simply because some people don't agree or like what they may or may not have said. It seems this is now a world-wide, societal phenomenon, with the cancel culture and all effecting everything everywhere.
Strange times.