Sir Donald Trump
Active member
wow, very interesting indeed, great postI was doing my best to sit this one out but I couldn't refrain any longer...
Volcanoes aren't brought up in climate change discussions for two reasons:
Volcanoes have been erupting for hundreds of millions of years, and over a long period of time, the carbon that they emit simply gets re-absorbed back into the soil, the rocks, the ocean, the plants, etc., and also pulled down into the Earth's core by plate tectonic subduction. This is called the "deep carbon cycle". Point being: even though volcanic eruptions are sudden, violent events, they are actually in balance with the Earth as a whole.
- There's nothing we can do about them, and
- They're not actually a problem.
The problem comes when humans arrive on the scene and start digging up fossilized trees from hundreds of millions of years ago and burning them for energy. The rate at which all eight billion of us are doing this globally is rapidly upsetting the inputs of an equation that had been in balance for billions of years.
Also, just in terms of numbers, volcanoes emit approximately 0.3 billion tonnes of CO2 per year, globally, whereas humans emit 35 billion tonnes of CO2 per year, or roughly 117x as much as volcanoes. (link)
Gasoline-powered vehicles are bad for the environment. So are electric vehicles. So is heating your home, so is growing oil palms for hand soap, so is buying food from the grocery store, so is building a new house to live in, so is building hydroelectric dams, and so is using the internet. Literally everything that makes up our current comfortable "western lifestyle" actually harms the planet in some way. This truth is so uncomfortable for most people to hear that they will more often than not just reject it altogether and reply with some witty-sounding quip that they heard on a radio talk show one time.
If we really want to get serious about helping the planet then we need to start talking about reducing our global human population—through completely ethical, voluntary means, of course! (Some people are so foreign to the topic of human overpopulation that they automatically think that you're advocating for genocide or forced-sterilization)
But yet again, having children is such a fundamental part of most peoples' minds and life experience that they would rather simply ignore any suggestion that the Earth is overpopulated or that our lifestyles are fundamentally unsustainable. But that doesn't change the fact that having one fewer child is 24x better for the environment than never driving a car again. (link)
It's a fundamental paradigm shift that most people aren't willing to let themselves have.