-
Featured
- #7,141
My view.
If Lotus has only built and/or shipped non-Carb state cars this has benefitted the dealers and buyers in those states and moved many people (including me) forward in the queue. It would also explain why there are FE 2.0 cars mixed in with the initial deliveries.
I was expecting delivery in the April timeframe which would have been better for me as I’m in Wisconsin and also need to sell another car. I’m not complaining as I’m happy to not move further out but it does explain how non-Carb approval may have thrown a wrench into the Lotus build sequence vs order date.
It’s possible I’m confused as there are a lot of posts on whether Carb state have had any cars built and/or delivered to dealers.
Obviously it would have helped if there was more transparency on how the Carb issue affected production and anticipated delivery dates.
If Lotus has only built and/or shipped non-Carb state cars this has benefitted the dealers and buyers in those states and moved many people (including me) forward in the queue. It would also explain why there are FE 2.0 cars mixed in with the initial deliveries.
I was expecting delivery in the April timeframe which would have been better for me as I’m in Wisconsin and also need to sell another car. I’m not complaining as I’m happy to not move further out but it does explain how non-Carb approval may have thrown a wrench into the Lotus build sequence vs order date.
It’s possible I’m confused as there are a lot of posts on whether Carb state have had any cars built and/or delivered to dealers.
Obviously it would have helped if there was more transparency on how the Carb issue affected production and anticipated delivery dates.